Skip to main content
IJCI logo

Independent · Peer Reviewed · Open Access

International Journal of Clinical Innovation

Advancing Clinical Research. Accelerating Innovation.

The International Journal of Clinical Innovation (IJCI) is an independent, peer-reviewed, open-access medical journal publishing clinically relevant research across medicine, medical education, outcomes, and healthcare innovation worldwide.

Open access

Free to read

Author fees

No APCs

Peer review

Double-blind

Publication model

Continuous

Latest research

Recently published

Featured publication

Article type
Original Article
Specialty
Neurosurgery
Published
September 10, 2026

Modified Fisher Scale Distribution and In-Hospital Outcomes in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury With Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Laura Perez Zabala, Helyhanna Paez, Luisciamni Molina, Lino Álvarez

Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) is a frequent imaging finding after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The modified Fisher (mFisher) scale was developed for nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, and its descriptive distribution in patients with tSAH may help characterize radiographic injury burden. Objective: To describe the distribution of mFisher grades and in-hospital outcomes among patients with moderate and severe TBI and tSAH treated at a tertiary neurosurgical service. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, single-center review of medical records from the Neurosurgery Service of Hospital Central de Maracay between 2015 and 2017. Of 205 records reviewed, 100 patients with documented moderate or severe TBI and tSAH comprised the analytic cohort. Demographic, clinical, imaging, treatment, and discharge-status variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. No inferential hypothesis testing or multivariable prognostic modeling was performed. Results: Seventy-one patients had moderate TBI and 29 had severe TBI. The cohort was 87% male, with a mean age of 37.66 years. Overall mFisher grades were I in 48%, II in 13%, III in 34%, and IV in 5%. In the moderate-TBI group, grade I was most frequent (52.1%), whereas grade III was most frequent in the severe-TBI group (41.3%). Overall, 58% of patients were discharged alive and 42% died during hospitalization. Mortality was 26.8% among patients with moderate TBI and 79.3% among those with severe TBI. The Marshall CT classification was not documented in 60% of records. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, higher mFisher grades were proportionally more common among patients with severe TBI than among those with moderate TBI, and in-hospital mortality was substantially higher in the severe-TBI group. Because the analysis was descriptive and did not adjust for injury severity or other confounders, these findings should not be interpreted as demonstrating independent prognostic performance of the mFisher scale. Further studies using prespecified inferential and multivariable methods are needed to evaluate its prognostic utility in tSAH.

Read featured article

01

Read

Browse current IJCI scholarship, new online articles, and Volume 1 updates.

Explore articles

02

Submit

Review article types, reporting requirements, ethics, and manuscript preparation guidance.

Author guidelines

03

Review

Learn how IJCI peer review works and how qualified clinicians and researchers can participate.

Reviewer information

Editorial credibility

Built around transparent scholarly practice.

Publication policies →

Editor-in-Chief

Juan Pablo Dugarte

View leadership

Editorial Board

Named journal team members and roles are published transparently.

Meet the board

Peer Review

Double-blind peer review with editorial conflict-of-interest safeguards.

How review works

Open Access

Published scholarship is free to read and there are currently no APCs.

Open access policy

Editorial process

A clear pathway from submission to publication.

Manuscripts move through editorial assessment, independent peer review when appropriate, revision, decision, and publication preparation.

How peer review works

Submission process

  1. 01

    Prepare

    Choose the article type, prepare a blinded manuscript, and gather the cover letter, declarations, figures, tables, and supporting files.

  2. 02

    Submit

    Enter author details, upload files, and confirm ethics, consent, conflicts, funding, data availability, and AI-use statements.

  3. 03

    Screening

    The Editorial Office checks scope, completeness, reporting, ethics, originality, and scientific suitability before external review when appropriate.

  4. 04

    Review & decision

    Independent reviewers assess manuscripts sent for external review. Authors receive decisions and revision instructions through the Author Portal.

  5. 05

    Publication

    Accepted work completes final publication checks and is published continuously as a Version of Record when production requirements are complete.

Editorial and peer-review timing varies by manuscript complexity, reviewer and editor availability, methodological or ethics consultation, and revision needs. Authors can check the current stage in the Author Portal.

Publish with IJCI

Submit clinically relevant medical research and innovation.

Review the author requirements, reporting standards, ethics expectations, and submission workflow before sending your manuscript.

Submit Manuscript